Very clever and original indeed. What you’ve essentially done is created a set of visual tableaux, both literal and figurative, with the receipts: on the one hand, we have the physical object (which is an image in itself), and on the other, the mental image that the details of each receipt evokes in our mind.
The beauty of this second image and its relation to the other images in the sequence is that it’s rather vague: as authorwilliammangieri says, it takes a little ‘detective work’ to build a story out of the evidence you’ve presented, and the trap (as in any attempt to infer logical relations in any set of discreet pieces of evidence) is that the inference each reader makes is ‘wrong’ with respect to what actually happened, or at least ‘different’. I don’t say that as a criticism; rather, I think it’s a mark of sophistication in your ‘assemblage’ of the evidence of the story that it allows for these multiple interpretations. Well done.
Object Relations 
That’s neat!
Beautifully done!
This is absolutely brilliant! A real trip!! Thanks for sharing
Very original and clever.
Wow! Great receipts! Thank you for sharing!
HAHA! I am so glad you glad this! Amazing messages! You are indeed as per your namesake, A Word Of Substance indeed 🙂
Nicely written! You really weave a story from just a few details 🙂
This is really, really cool
Excellent!
Admiring the execution of your story here.
This is brilliant! I love clever ways of sharing a story. This say so much!
Love this!!
One of these should be matted and framed. Hung in the bedroom x
This is the coolest thing! Anger Management can get pricey, cheaper to buy a book from Self Hope Books!
This is so hysterical. I was also amused by the cost of anger management. Object relations, huh?? Best way to describe this. So funny.
Love this! Priceless!
What a creative way to tell a story!
Excellent idea! Very clever, I really enjoyed it.
Anger management classes are priceless
Enjoyed the concept – took a LITTLE detective work to absorb, but that was part of the charm. Thanx!
love it!!!
Very clever and original indeed. What you’ve essentially done is created a set of visual tableaux, both literal and figurative, with the receipts: on the one hand, we have the physical object (which is an image in itself), and on the other, the mental image that the details of each receipt evokes in our mind.
The beauty of this second image and its relation to the other images in the sequence is that it’s rather vague: as authorwilliammangieri says, it takes a little ‘detective work’ to build a story out of the evidence you’ve presented, and the trap (as in any attempt to infer logical relations in any set of discreet pieces of evidence) is that the inference each reader makes is ‘wrong’ with respect to what actually happened, or at least ‘different’. I don’t say that as a criticism; rather, I think it’s a mark of sophistication in your ‘assemblage’ of the evidence of the story that it allows for these multiple interpretations. Well done.