The Receipts

 

receipt.0763391001551448655receipt.0533672001551449080receipt.0830024001551449416receipt.0787904001551449920receipt.0949851001551450199receipt.0832310001551450349receipt.0623991001551450508receipt.0001724001551450812receipt.0417204001551451112receipt.0169789001551451257receipt.0628984001551451421

22 responses to “The Receipts”

  1. This is absolutely brilliant! A real trip!! Thanks for sharing

    Like

  2. Very original and clever.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Wow! Great receipts! Thank you for sharing!

    Like

  4. HAHA! I am so glad you glad this! Amazing messages! You are indeed as per your namesake, A Word Of Substance indeed 🙂

    Like

  5. Nicely written! You really weave a story from just a few details 🙂

    Like

  6. This is really, really cool

    Like

  7. Admiring the execution of your story here.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. This is brilliant! I love clever ways of sharing a story. This say so much!

    Like

  9. One of these should be matted and framed. Hung in the bedroom x

    Like

  10. This is the coolest thing! Anger Management can get pricey, cheaper to buy a book from Self Hope Books!

    Liked by 1 person

  11. This is so hysterical. I was also amused by the cost of anger management. Object relations, huh?? Best way to describe this. So funny.

    Like

  12. Love this! Priceless!

    Like

  13. What a creative way to tell a story!

    Like

  14. Excellent idea! Very clever, I really enjoyed it.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Anger management classes are priceless

    Like

  16. Enjoyed the concept – took a LITTLE detective work to absorb, but that was part of the charm. Thanx!

    Like

  17. love it!!!

    Like

  18. Very clever and original indeed. What you’ve essentially done is created a set of visual tableaux, both literal and figurative, with the receipts: on the one hand, we have the physical object (which is an image in itself), and on the other, the mental image that the details of each receipt evokes in our mind.

    The beauty of this second image and its relation to the other images in the sequence is that it’s rather vague: as authorwilliammangieri says, it takes a little ‘detective work’ to build a story out of the evidence you’ve presented, and the trap (as in any attempt to infer logical relations in any set of discreet pieces of evidence) is that the inference each reader makes is ‘wrong’ with respect to what actually happened, or at least ‘different’. I don’t say that as a criticism; rather, I think it’s a mark of sophistication in your ‘assemblage’ of the evidence of the story that it allows for these multiple interpretations. Well done.

    Like

Leave a comment